Page 1434 - Week 04 - Thursday, 4 April 2019
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
(3) See answer to (1)
(4) See answer to (1)
(5) None, The campaign drew on publically available information about how successful Walk-in Centres are.
(6) The concept was developed by ACT Labor. Staff in the Minister’s Office advised on publically available information on public health in the ACT.
(7) (a) (i) None (ii) None
(b) See answer to question 1
(c) (i) & (ii) None
(d) (i) & (ii) None
(8) (a) None
(b) None
(9) See answer to (1). The ACT Government did not contract any services in relation to the campaign.
(10) (a) None
(b) See answer to (1).
(11) N/A
(12) (a) None
(b) None
ACT Health—consultants
(Question No 2117)
Mrs Dunne asked the Minister for Health and Wellbeing, upon notice, on 15 February 2019:
(1) In relation to the answer given at part (1)(iii) (relating to contract 2016-2074 with Ernst and Young) of question on notice No 1734, if data was not available to be given to the contractor, why did the directorate enter into the contract.
(2) Why did the directorate not accept the report of the contractor.
(3) What specific elements of the report led the directorate to reject it.
(4) In reaching a decision to reject the report, did the directorate conclude that Ernst and Young had failed to deliver on the agreed contractual terms.
(5) Was Ernst and Young paid the agreed contract price; if so, why; if not, (a) how much was paid, (b) on what basis, (c) what consultation/negotiation process was engaged and (d) was a dispute involved; if yes, how was it settled.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video