Page 2193 - Week 06 - Thursday, 8 June 2017

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video


(5) How are work requirements assessed and by whom.

(6) In relation to non-routine repairs and maintenance, how much was spent in (a) 2012-13, (b) 2013-14, (c) 2014-15, (d) 2015-16 and (e) 2016-17 (year to date).

(7) What was the funding source for those years listed in part (6).

(8) What was the nature of the work done for those years listed in part (6).

(9) Who was contracted or otherwise engaged to carry out the work for those years listed in part (6).

(10) In relation to each artwork, (a) when was it acquired, (b) how much did it cost, (c) who was the artist, (d) where did the artist live at the time of acquisition, (e) what is its current value and (f) when was that value assessed and by whom.

Mr Ramsay: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

(1) The total budget for public art repairs and maintenance for each year is as follows, noting that budget is for both routine and non-routine maintenance as identified in the budget papers:

a. 2012-13: $150,000

b. 2013-14: $154,000

c. 2014-15: $157,000

d. 2015-16: $162,000

e. 2016-17: $164,000

(2) Repairs and maintenance expenditure for each year is as follows, noting that expenditure is a total of both routine and non-routine maintenance. Public art repairs and maintenance expenditure is recorded in total figures to enable reporting against the budget allocation :

a. 2012-13: $143,102

b. 2013-14: $157,756

c. 2014-15: $156,091

d. 2015-16: $162,000

e. 2016-17: $70,836.75 to 31 May 2017

(3) The program for repairs and maintenance for artworks is documented by the artist in an artwork maintenance manual. Requirements for reactive maintenance (such as graffiti removal) are assessed on an as-needs basis by Cultural Canberra with input from artists, artwork conservators and other specialist consultants and contractors as required. The artwork repairs and maintenance program was completed as planned in previous financial years and as scheduled to date in 2016-17.

(4) The contractors engaged to deliver the work for the years referred to in part (1) were as follows:

Armature Design Support

Art & Archival

Artillion Pty Ltd


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video