Page 3384 - Week 10 - Thursday, 19 October 2006

(2) How many of these public servants have (a) lost their jobs and (b) been demoted.

Mr Corbell: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

(1) One public servant in JACS was disciplined for breaching privacy guidelines for an incident that occurred in September 2004.

(2) The officer did not lose their job and was not demoted. The sanction applied was a transfer to other duties.

Public service—privacy guidelines
(Question No 1239)

Mr Stefaniak asked the Minister for Police and Emergency Services, upon notice, on 20 September 2006:

(1) How many public servants in your Department have been disciplined for breaching privacy guidelines between 1 July 2004 and 30 June 2006;

(2) How many of these public servants have (a) lost their jobs and (b) been demoted.

Mr Corbell: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

(1) Two – being one sworn member and one unsworn member of ACT Policing.

(2) None.

Mr Stefaniak asked the Treasurer, upon notice, on 20 September 2006:

(1) How many public servants in your Department have been disciplined for breaching privacy guidelines between 1 July 2004 and 30 June 2006;

(2) How many of these public servants have (a) lost their jobs and (b) been demoted.

Mr Stanhope: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

(1) No public servants in the Department of Treasury have been disciplined for breaching privacy guidelines between 1 July 2004 and 30 June 2006.

(2) Not applicable.

Mr Stefaniak asked the Minister for the Territory and Municipal Services, upon notice, on 20 September 2006: