Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .
Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 1996 Week 14 Hansard (11 December) . . Page.. 4752 ..
MS HORODNY (continuing):
Each dimension has an impact on residential areas. Its length and height
affect its manoeuvrability, its visual impact, and where it can be parked on a
block. Its weight also affects its manoeuvrability and the damage it can cause
to road and ground surfaces. This becomes a very significant point when we
come to the proposed new section 150G, which totally bans certain types of
trucks from residential areas. We note that the explanatory memorandum uses
"or" when it refers to truck dimensions, but the Bill uses "and"; so something
has clearly gone wrong in the drafting of this clause of the Bill.
The second amendment relates to the previous amendment and is designed to get consistency in the definition of a heavy vehicle across the whole Bill.
MR MOORE (6.12): Mr Speaker, I rise to support these very sensible amendments, which provide consistency. As I indicated earlier, I would probably have gone even further than this, although not much further. I think these are very sensible amendments, and I urge members to support them.
MR DE DOMENICO (Minister for Urban Services) (6.12): Mr Speaker, the Government will not be supporting the amendments. Quite simply, they contradict and go against the 18-month consultation process on which we have come to a compromise.
Question put:
That the amendments (Ms Horodny's) be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 4 NOES, 13 Ms Horodny Mr Berry Mr Kaine Mr Moore Mrs Carnell Ms McRae Mr Osborne Mr Cornwell Ms Reilly Ms Tucker Mr De Domenico Mr Stefaniak Ms Follett Mr Whitecross Mr Hird Mr Wood Mr HumphriesQuestion so resolved in the negative.
MS HORODNY (6.17): I move:
Page 4, line 7, proposed subsection 150F(3), omit "not".
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .