Page 2258 - Week 07 - Thursday, 16 June 1994
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
3
WHO HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A SUMMARY OFFENCE TO THE
TRIBUNAL FOR THE MAKING OF A MENTAL HEALTH ORDER.
THE BILL ALSO CONTAINS SIGNIFICANT NEW PROVISIONS
RELATING TO MENTALLY DYSFUNCTIONAL PERSONS COMMITTED
FOR TRIAL IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR INDICTABLE OFFENCES.
IN FUTURE THE SUPREME COURT WILL REFER A MENTALLY
DYSFUNCTIONAL PERSON TO THE TRIBUNAL
• FOR A DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER THE PERSON IS FIT
TO PLEAD TO A CHARGE FOR AN OFFENCE;
• FOR ADVICE ON THE SENTENCING OF THE PERSON IF HE OR
SHE IS FOUND GUILTY OF THE OFFENCE;
• FOR ADVICE ON HOW THE COURT SHOULD DEAL WITH THE
PERSON IF HE OR SHE IS FOUND NOT GUILTY OF THE
OFFENCE ON THE GROUND OF MENTAL ILLNESS, -
FOR FOR THE TRIBUNAL TO MAKE MENTAL HEALTH ORDERS FOR
THE PERSON IF IMPRISONING THE PERSON WOULD BE
INAPPROPRIATE.
THE TRIBUNAL WILL HAVE THE IMPORTANT FUNCTION OF
ASSISTING THE COURTS BY MAKING DETERMINATIONS AS TO
FITNESS TO PLEAD. THE BILL IS BASED ON THE VIEW THAT A
FUNCTION OF THIS KIND, INVOLVING AS IT DOES COMPLEX
QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PERSON'S MENTAL CAPACITY, IS BEST
DETERMINED BY AN EXPERT BODY LIKE THE TRIBUNAL.
2258
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .