Page 2237 - Week 07 - Thursday, 16 June 1994
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
THE ACT DOES NOT FORMALLY RECOGNISE TELEPHONE HEARINGS AND
CONFERENCES YET THEY ARE REGULARLY USED BY THE TRIBUNAL.
CLAUSE 15 WILL INSERT SECTION 34A WHICH EXPRESSLY PROVIDES THAT
THE TRIBUNAL MAY ALLOW A PERSON TO PARTICIPATE IN PROCEEDINGS BY
TELEPHONE, CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION AND ANY OTHER MEANS OF
COMMUNICATION.
AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 43 AND THE INSERTION OF A NEW SECTION 43A
WILL EXPAND THE TRIBUNAL'S POWERS TO DISMISS APPLICATIONS. THERE
WILL BE A NEW POWER TO DISMISS MATTERS WHERE THERE IS DELAY BY
THE APPLICANT IN PURSUING THE APPLICATION, WHERE THERE IS NOT A
REVIEWABLE DECISION OR WHERE THE APPLICATION IS FRIVOLOUS OR
VEXATIOUS.
MADAM SPEAKER, AS I MENTIONED AT THE OUTSET, THE BACKGROUND TO
THE AMENDMENTS IN THIS BILL CAN BE FOUND IN EVENTS WHICH HAVE
OCCURRED IN RELATION TO THE COMMONWEALTH TRIBUNAL. THIS IS
AGAIN THE CASE IN RELATION TO THOSE AMENDMENTS WHICH PROVIDE
FOR THE INTRODUCTION OF A CODE OF PRACTICE TO SET MINIMUM
STANDARDS FOR NOTICES OF DECISIONS AND RIGHTS OF REVIEW.
s
2237
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .