Page 1281 - Week 04 - Thursday, 21 April 1994
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
Mr. Lamont - the answer to the Members question is as follows:
1. The Conditions of Tendering were the standard clauses contained in all tender
packages for South Building Refurbishment project and were consistent with
conditions included in all ACT Public Works & Services tender documents.
2. 14 October 1993
3. 14 October 1993
4. Documents were couriered to the various tenderers.
5. 4 November 1993
6. All tenders were lodged in the locked tender box at the-offices of ACT Public
Works and Services prior to 2.00 pm on 4 November 1993.
7. It is common practice within the industry to seek around six tenders when using
selected tendering procurement. In this instance the tender process was
managed by the Project Manager for the works. He followed normal practice
and applied the following selection criteria:-
A reputation of high quality prestige joinery,
A high production capacity,
A proven track record in this specialised type of furniture, and
_ The ability to perform within a short period of 3 months which
included the Christmas/New Year period, traditionally a period
of production problems.
Only five firms met the above criteria.
8. A total of eight local firms were considered, two of which were included on the
select tender list having met the above criteria.
9. The recommendations of the Select Committee on Estimates 1993-94 dated
November 1993, were not available nor in effect at the time of tendering of this
trade package.
1281
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .