Page 3684 - Week 12 - Wednesday, 20 October 1993
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
Detail Stage
Bill, by leave, taken as a whole
MR CONNOLLY (Attorney-General, Minister for Housing and Community Services and Minister for Urban Services) (4.11), by leave: Madam Speaker, I move:
Clause 5, page 2 -
Line 18, proposed new paragraph 36A(1)(a), add at the end "or".
Line 21, proposed new paragraph 36A(1)(b), omit "or" (last occurring).
Lines 22 and 23, proposed new paragraph 36A(1)(c), omit the paragraph.
These amendments, as I indicated, remove the reference to 10 years as one of the criteria for destroying documents and put the "or" in the correct place.
Amendments agreed to.
Bill, as a whole, as amended, agreed to.
Bill, as amended, agreed to.
LAND (PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT)
(AMENDMENT) BILL (NO. 4) 1993
[COGNATE BILL:
LAND (PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT) (CONSEQUENTIAL PROVISIONS) (AMENDMENT) BILL (NO. 2) 1993]
Debate resumed from 12 October 1993, on motion by Mr Wood:
That this Bill be agreed to in principle.
MADAM SPEAKER: Is it the wish of the Assembly to debate this order of the day concurrently with the Land (Planning and Environment) (Consequential Provisions) (Amendment) Bill (No. 2) 1993? There being no objection, that course will be followed. I remind members that in debating order of the day No. 5 they may also address their remarks to order of the day No. 6.
MR KAINE (4.15): Madam Speaker, the Liberals in opposition are prepared to support this Bill along with the amendments that the Minister is proposing to it. However, there are a couple of comments that I would like to make in that connection. First of all, this is a new experiment. Mr De Domenico can speak for himself; but I am sure that, when it was put to us in the Planning, Development and Infrastructure Committee that such an appeal board should be established, both he and I had some reservations because there are the processes of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal currently open to anybody who wishes to appeal and, of course, there are the normal courts and the normal legal processes that can be followed. However, we did accept the argument from the
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .