Page 5892 - Week 18 - Wednesday, 11 December 1991

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .

---

Question put:

That the amendments (Mr Collaery's) be agreed to.

The Assembly voted -

AYES, 7  NOES, 10 

Mr Collaery Mr Berry
Mr Humphries Mr Connolly
Mr Jensen Mr Duby
Mr Kaine Ms Follett
Dr Kinloch Mrs Grassby
Mr Prowse Ms Maher
Mr Stefaniak Mr Moore
 Mrs Nolan
 Mr Stevenson
 Mr Wood

Question so resolved in the negative.

MR SPEAKER: The question now is: That clauses 4, 5 and 6 be agreed to.

MR CONNOLLY (Attorney-General, Minister for Housing and Community Services and Minister for Urban Services) (12.18): Essentially, we have now had the vote and debate on this issue. Mr Collaery put what he said was the most refined version of his proposal. We are now back to the incitement, aiding and abetting, conspiracy thing, which is a fairly broad-ranging, all-encompassing proposal. Mr Collaery acknowledged that there were some substantial difficulties with it, and the Government's view certainly would be that they should all be negatived.

MR COLLAERY (12.18): Mr Speaker, clause 6 no longer stands. We should not be speaking to it. Clauses 4, 5 and 6 are to be omitted. We have had the vote on the Bill. We have finished the detail stage.

Mr Connolly: No, we voted on your amendment, which was to delete clauses 4, 5 and 6, and that was negatived. What is now before the Assembly is the original form of your Bill, which you have acknowledged you have some problems with.

MR COLLAERY: I withdraw clause 6, Mr Speaker.

MR SPEAKER: I am not sure that you can do that.

Mr Moore: Why don't we just negative it - vote against it?

MR COLLAERY: Yes. I move:

That the question be now put.

Question resolved in the affirmative.

---

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .