Page 5685 - Week 17 - Thursday, 5 December 1991
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
incentives where that can be done is great because that actually provides employment and other things. Speculation on land does not provide employment and so forth; it provides a profit for a small number of people within our society, instead of spreading that money across our society in general.
In the case of the Forrest bowling club, of course, that public land, given for a public use - namely, that of operating a bowling club open to any member of the public who wishes to become a member of that club - could well have been made available, for example, to the tennis club. Under a 100 per cent regime, it may well have been - we do not know - that we would have seen that piece of land retained for community purposes.
Question put:
That the amendment (Mr Moore's) be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 1 NOES, 14
Mr Moore Mr Berry
Mr Collaery
Mr Connolly
Mr Duby
Ms Follett
Mrs Grassby
Mr Humphries
Mr Jensen
Mr Kaine
Dr Kinloch
Ms Maher
Mr Prowse
Mr Stefaniak
Mr Wood
Question so resolved in the negative.
Clause agreed to.
Clauses 184 to 190, by leave, taken together, and agreed to.
Clause 191
Amendment (by Mr Wood) agreed to:
Page 90, line 15, paragraph 191(b), omit "Territory".
Clause, as amended, agreed to.
Clauses 192 to 195, by leave, taken together, and agreed to.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .