Page 5361 - Week 17 - Tuesday, 3 December 1991

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .

---

MR SPEAKER: The question is: That Mr Jensen's amendment No. 19 to clause 22 be agreed to. Those of that opinion say Aye; to the contrary, No. I think the Noes have it.

Mr Jensen: Mr Speaker, I raise a point of order. As I understand it, the issue that we are looking at is my circulated amendment No. 19, which includes subclause (7). So, it would seem to me, then, that the Government is, in fact, not supporting what it had already agreed to. I wonder whether it wants to reconsider.

MR SPEAKER: Are you calling for a vote on this, Mr Jensen?

Mr Jensen: Yes.

Question put:

That the amendment (Mr Jensen's) be agreed to.

The Assembly voted -

AYES, 4  NOES, 12 

Mr Collaery Mr Berry
Mr Jensen Mr Connolly
Dr Kinloch Mr Duby
Mr Moore Ms Follett
 Mrs Grassby
 Mr Humphries
 Mr Kaine
 Ms Maher
 Mrs Nolan
 Mr Prowse
 Mr Stefaniak
 Mr Wood

Question so resolved in the negative.

Amendment (by Mr Jensen, by leave) negatived:

Page 12, line 34, add the following subclause:

"(6) The Authority shall by notice in writing served by post on each person who provided written comments concerning the draft variation (being a notice served within 7 days after the decision to review the draft Plan variation is made by the Authority) advise the person that documents referred to in subsection (1) are available for public inspection.".

MR MOORE (12.08): Mr Speaker, I rise to move the amendment that I foreshadowed. The amendment that I circulated I had taken from a much earlier draft that Mr Jensen had given me. At that stage it did not include the words "on a Saturday". So, I am circulating a revised version. I move:

---

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .