Page 3967 - Week 13 - Thursday, 17 October 1991
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
through the detail of what the Government was proposing, taking on quite a degree of change to the original government proposals to reflect community views that were being transmitted by both Mr Stefaniak and Mr Collaery.
At the end of the day we have got through the house a piece of legislation which reflects very fully the views of the community and which is a credit to the Territory. It is a matter of some pleasure that persons in need of this type of assistance in the Territory will no longer suffer the indignity of having to appeal in the Supreme Court under the Lunacy Act of 1898. May that procedure be consigned to the dustbin of legal history.
Amendment agreed to.
Remainder of Bill, as amended, agreed to.
Bill, as amended, agreed to.
GUARDIANSHIP AND MANAGEMENT OF PROPERTY (CONSEQUENTIAL PROVISIONS) BILL 1991
Consideration resumed from 12 September 1991, on motion by Mr Connolly:
That this Bill be agreed to in principle.
Question resolved in the affirmative.
Bill agreed to in principle.
Leave granted to dispense with the detail stage.
Bill agreed to.
COMMUNITY ADVOCATE BILL 1991
Consideration resumed from 12 September 1991, on motion by Mr Connolly:
That this Bill be agreed to in principle.
Question resolved in the affirmative.
Bill agreed to in principle.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .