Page 1126 - Week 04 - Thursday, 29 March 1990
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
I think it is perfectly in order that Mr Moore should seek that leave and I would agree that he should receive it.
As for the point made by the Chief Minister, that he only found out about the expenditure yesterday, that was the case as to myself too. I thought at the time that perhaps as a general rule we should know sooner than that that such a situation is occurring.
DR KINLOCH (4.31): Mr Speaker, I find myself in very much of three minds, if not four minds on this - - -
Debate interrupted.
ADJOURNMENT
MR SPEAKER: Order! It being slightly past 4.30, I propose the question:
That the Assembly do now adjourn.
Mr Collaery: I require the question be put forthwith without debate.
Question resolved in the negative.
LEAVE OF ABSENCE TO MEMBERS
Debate resumed.
DR KINLOCH: Perhaps, Mr Speaker, I even have five minds on this matter. Let us take several things here. There is a conference in London, I understand, which pertains to a matter before the committee of which Mr Moore is chairman. I can see that he would wish to go to that conference if the committee members so wished. That is one issue. Then there is the issue of payment or financial support for that. I would like to talk about a similar situation. I propose to go to a conference in Sydney in June-July. I was not planning to ask for permission - but I will if need be - and I was not proposing to ask for any money to go to that conference; it is a conference I wish to go to. Similarly, there is a conference in Zimbabwe in September and I understand that members of the Assembly do not wish to - - -
MR SPEAKER: Order, Dr Kinloch! Really, it is not relevant.
DR KINLOCH: It is very relevant, Mr Speaker; if you will allow me, I will continue.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .