Page 1845 - Week 06 - Thursday, 30 July 2020
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
During the time periods in question there have not been any occurrences where a company selling a property on behalf of the Suburban Land Agency has also been engaged to provide valuation advice that has been used to determine pricing.
Planning—development applications
(Question No 3051)
Mr Parton asked the Minister for Planning and Land Management, upon notice, on 19 June 2020:
(1) In relation to a possible development on Block 2 Section 57 Greenway, for an eight-storey complex of 144 units at 305 Anketell Street (currently zoned as CZ2 according to ACTMAPI), who is the current owner of the lease located at Block 2 Section 57 Greenway?
(2) What will be the process and cost of having it reclassified into a residential zone category suitable for an eight-storey residential structure or greater, assuming the zone classification reflected in ACTMAPI is correct.
(3) What would be the appropriate residential zone category for an eight-storey residential structure.
(4) How many storeys are generally permissible for a development proposal under RZ4 or RZ5.
(5) If a development application (DA) is submitted for this development, what community consultation would be expected (or required) to occur during the DA consultation period.
(6) What action is taken in regard to the community feedback on a DA.
(7) Would action be taken to have a DA modified in response to community feedback.
(8) What is the process and steps that the DA proponent must take in order to have the block (Block 2 Section 57) reclassified to another zone category eg RZ4 or RZ5 compared with the current CZ2.
(9) Is it possible for the proponent to subsequently seek a variation to the number of storeys previously approved once a DA is approved for a specified number of storeys within a residential zone category.
(10) Would the change referred to in part (9) require a completely new DA or a variation to the previously approved DA.
(11) Would a new round of public consultation be required.
(12) If there was significant public concern with a development of the nature that might be proposed for Block 2 Section 57 Greenway, what role would the Government have in conducting further public consultations or in mediation between the
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video