Page 1109 - Week 03 - Thursday, 21 March 2019

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video

Table 34: Time (in days) for completion of unimproved value appeals that were completed in each financial year

Year

Appeals (No.)

Minimum

Median

Average

Maximum

2014-15

28

11

114

160

368

2015-16

6

90

289

431

1,071

2016-17

6

91

381

334

482

2017-18

*11

11

60

97

329

2018-19 (to 22/02/2019)

2

64

95

95

126

*Includes one lease variation charge appeal.

ACT Health—workplace culture
(Question No 2331)

Mr Coe asked the Minister for Mental Health, upon notice, on 22 February 2019:

(1) How many (a) individuals and (b) organisations that provided submissions indicated they would happy to communicate further about their submission in relation to the Interim Report into the workplace culture within ACT public health services.

(2) In relation to part (1), how many (a) individuals and (b) organisations were communicated with broken down by type of further communication.

(3) How many (a) individuals and (b) organisations who made submissions to the review been identified by the ACT Government by their (i) submission, (ii) the reviewer or (iii) through any other means.

(4) How has the ACT Government followed up on the submissions made to the review to date.

(5) How does the ACT Government intend to follow up on the submissions made to the review in the future.

Mr Rattenbury: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

(1) The Office of the Review have advised that individuals and organisations were not specifically asked if they would be happy to communicate further about their submission in relation to the Interim Report. The submission form did not ask this question.

(2) Nil

(3) The protection of people’s confidentiality and privacy is paramount to the Independent Panel and Office of the Review. All submissions were accepted and dealt with in accordance with the requests of those that made the submission.

The Office of the Review have advised that in a small number of cases the Review referred specific matters individuals had raised (including their identity) to the Director General (DG) ACT Health, and the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Canberra Health Services (CHS) where the individual/s agreed to that information being provided.

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video