Page 4333 - Week 11 - Thursday, 25 October 2018
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
(2) What where the most common reasons for section 62 notices to be given.
(3) Has there been instances where section 62 notices have been ignored; if so, how many instances, and when.
(4) What action is taken against a building occupier in circumstances where section 62 notices have been ignored.
Mr Ramsay: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:
(1) Access Canberra, and its predecessor organisations, has records of issuing the following notices under section 62 of the Building Act 2004 (the Act) for the following years:
|
Year |
Notices |
|
2013 |
4 |
|
2014 |
9 |
|
2015 |
4 |
|
2016 |
3 |
|
2017 |
3 |
|
2018 |
4 |
|
Total |
27 |
Access Canberra, and its predecessor organisations, has records of issuing the following notices under section 62 of the Act for the following suburbs:
|
Suburb |
Notices |
|
Banks |
1 |
|
Braddon |
1 |
|
City |
5 |
|
Denman Prospect |
1 |
|
Downer |
2 |
|
Dunlop |
1 |
|
Fyshwick |
1 |
|
Gordon |
3 |
|
Holt |
1 |
|
Hume |
2 |
|
Kambah |
1 |
|
Lyneham |
1 |
|
Macgregor |
1 |
|
McKellar |
1 |
|
Monash |
1 |
|
Pialligo |
1 |
|
Red Hill |
1 |
|
Stirling |
1 |
|
Theodore |
1 |
|
Total |
27 |
(2) The most common reasons for issuing a section 62 notice related to fire-damaged buildings (12 notices) and pool safety (10 notices).
(3) No.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video