Page 1848 - Week 05 - Thursday, 10 May 2018

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video

(6) In relation to the specific programs outlined in the answer to part (5), how much of the grant funding provided in answer to part (4) is for the delivery of each program.

(7) What is the explanation for the difference if the total funding for the programs listed in parts (5) and (6) does not equate to the funding provided in the answer to part (4).

(9) What specific programs were or are being delivered for each year listed in part (8).

(10) How much of the grant funding was provided for each specific program provided in the answer to part (9) and for each year listed in part (8).

(11) Has the Government delivered on its election promise that it would provide the ANU with funding of $1 million over four years for its “advanced music program”.

(12) Is this funding in addition to any amounts provided in the answer to parts (1) to (10) as they relate to the years 2017 and 2018; if not, why not.

(13) What does the Government understand to be offered in the “advanced music program.

(14) In relation to the Minister’s answer to the question without notice asked on 15 February 2018 about the Music Engagement Program, what were the stated reasons for the decision that the funding application for the Music Engagement Program for Years 1 to 6 students and for teacher professional development was unsuccessful.

(15) Will the Minister provide a copy of the statement of reasons; if not, why not.

(16) What specific criteria were used to evaluate the application.

(17) To what extent were the annual “Summary of Activity” documents provided by the program reviewed in the context of the assessment of the application; if none, why not.

(18) To what extent was further information sought from the funding applicant; if none, why not.

(19) What other consultation was undertaken in assessing the application, and with whom; if none, why not.

(20) Which national peers provided independent advice on the new music outreach program.

(21) What written advice was provided in that process; if none, why not.

(22) Will the Minister provide a copy of any written advice; if not, why not.

(23) As part of giving the independent advice what review did the national peers undertake of the existing Music Engagement Program; if none, why not

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video