Page 1846 - Week 05 - Thursday, 11 May 2017
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
Land—valuations
(Question No 146)
Mr Coe asked the Treasurer, upon notice, on 24 March 2017:
(1) What is the aggregate rates assessment (assuming the current average unimproved values) under the (a) current rating regime and the (b) proposed regime under the Revenue Legislation Amendment Bill for the properties of (i) Phillip—Block 12, Section 18, (ii) Deakin—Block 20, Section 12, (iii) Griffith—Block 4, Section 41, (iv) Kingston—Block 1, Section 65, (v) Kingston—Block 2, Section 18, (vi) City—Block 1, Section 52, (vii) Turner—Block 3, Section 41, (viii) City—Block 18, Section 2, (ix) City—Block 5, Section 2, (x) Braddon—Block 15, Section 7, (xi) Harrison—Block 1, Section 108, (xii) Franklin—Block 2, Section 126, (xiii) Gungahlin—Block 7, Section 13, (xiv) Amaroo—Block 1, Section 69, (xv) Forde—Block 1, Section 30, (xvi) Nicholls—Block 2, Section 70, (xvii) Nicholls—Block 3, Section 89, (xviii) Nicholls—Block 4, Section 89, (xix) Nicholls—Block 10, Section 89, (xx) Nicholls—Block 6, Section 89, (xxi) Crace—Block 6, Section 26, (xxii) Palmerston—Block 7, Section 128, (xxiii) Page—Block 3, Section 7, (xxiv) Belconnen—Block 10, Section 44, (xxv) Belconnen—Block 3, Section 106, (xxvi) Bruce—Block 5, Section 91, (xxvii) Scullin—Block 1, Section 20, (xxviii) Holt—Block 1, Section 78, (xxix) Wright—Block 3, Section 15, (xxx) Holder—Block 36, Section 43, (xxxi) Waramanga— Block 8, Section 41, (xxxii) Greenway—Block 2, Section 30, (xxxiii) Bonython—Block 2, Section 22, (xxxiv) Calwell—Block 9, Section 795, (xxxv) Gilmore—Block 17, Section 50, (xxxvi) Gowrie—Block 12, Section 226, (xxxvii) Kambah—Block 1, Section 283, (xxxviii) Mawson—Block 20, Section 47, (xxxix) Turner—Block 3, Section 45, (xl) Giralang—Block 1, Section 78, (xli) Florey—Block 9, Section 187, (xlii) Charnwood—Block 36, Section 95 and (xliii) Charnwood—Block 2, Section 94.
(2) What is the average unimproved value for each of the properties listed in part (1).
(3) How many units are on each property.
(4) What is the total unit entitlement.
(5) How much of the total rates assessment is (a) fixed charge and (b) the variable charge.
Mr Barr: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:
(1) a, b This information is not able to be provided as it requires significant resources to compile. This is because to determine the total general rates paid by the block requires the individual general rates assessment for each unit in the block to be calculated and aggregated. Further the information could inadvertently lead to the disclosure of individual tax payer information depending on the number and ownership of units in a block.
(2) AUVs for blocks and sections are publicly available from Access Canberra and also listed on the All Homes website.
(3) Individual information about the number of units in a block is not able to be provided as it requires significant resources to compile.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video