Page 3827 - Week 12 - Thursday, 30 October 2014
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
We didn’t think this would have much effect on our son being two years old, however when we are discussing “Mr Fluffy” or the situation we are in he keeps coming up to us both saying “Sorry Mummy” “Sorry Daddy” and rests his head on our lap as if he can sense the heartbreak in our voice …
This is a small glimpse into the human impact of this issue. Later this morning I will table the group impact statement of the Fluffy Owners and Residents Action Group. It contains hundreds of accounts like this over more than 300 pages, all of which are heartfelt, often heartbreaking and very moving. They illustrate the way this issue has affected the full spectrum of our community.
I know the process of writing has been very important for many owners and residents in dealing with the distress and upheaval of recent times and I hope that the tabling today provides the acknowledgement they have sought.
Many of the stories contained in this statement paint a picture of the shock and grief for many learning they lived in a Mr Fluffy home, and what that means. Stories of the guilt from potentially exposing infants, children, loved ones and friends to the risk of exposure to Mr Fluffy asbestos are powerful. People’s selfless reactions show that for most, the greatest fear is for their families. There are stories of newborns coming home from hospital, children playing as renovations were carried out, generations of families enjoying those times together over many years.
The statements also tell of the social isolation and guilt that have come with learning of the risks of living in a Mr Fluffy home: friends that no longer visit; play dates and sleepovers, which are such normal activities for most households, stopped suddenly; cherished memories and favourite pastimes which, with new knowledge, turned to images that haunt and upset.
After reading all of these stories, one thing is clear: not one of the people dealing now with such anguish knew of the risks present in their homes, and no-one did anything wrong. I genuinely hope that by having a way forward, the distress which fills these pages can be eased and the upset and worry which so many speak of can be calmed.
I acknowledge today the advocacy of those who have stood bravely to argue their case, to make governments listen, often having to share their most difficult times publicly. They are the true heroes of this painful Canberra story, and I thank each one of them today.
The decision to demolish 1,021 houses is a big call. But I cannot see any other way through this. We cannot let this legacy continue. It has plagued this city now for more than half of Canberra’s history. It must end and it will with the buyback scheme being put in place this week.
Canberra is a kind and caring city. This is part of what makes it a great place to live. We have seen over the years that when some are struggling or suffering, the community rallies to support them and do what we can to help. This is the approach that I have taken as Chief Minister when considering the options before us. Some
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video