Page 2681 - Week 08 - Thursday, 14 August 2014
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
(6) What was the annual revenue generated by the TCH WiC for the years referred to in part (1).
(7) What was the (a) full-time equivalent (FTE) for TCH WiC, (b) classifications of all staff who worked in TCH WiC and (c) number of nurses in the TCH WiC for the years referred to in part (1).
(8) What was the (a) number of staff in other roles, (b) nurse turnover rate, (c) other staff turnover rate and (d) average annual salary including penalties and overtime of an individual (i) nurse and (ii) support staff, at the TCH WiC for the years referred to in part (1).
(9) What training was conducted and what was the cost for WiC staff of the TCH WiC, (a) prior to the TCH WiC opening, (b) prior to individual staff joining the WiC, (c) as in-service training and (d) for staff to attend conferences and seminars (i) in the ACT and (ii) interstate, for each year referred to in part (1).
(10) For each training program which was provided by external providers (a) who have been the external training service providers for the WiC, (b) how were each of the training providers selected, (c) how much was paid annually to each external training provider and (d) what were the venues for each of the external training courses, for the years referred to in part (1).
(11) In relation to the TCH WiC, what was the number of (a) patients, (b) presentations, if not the same as number of patients, (c) patients who did not wait and (d) patients assessed by a nurse who were (i) provided with an Interim Care Plan, as described in the Hansard of 18 March 2014, p 440, (ii) fully treated by a nurse, (iii) redirected to a general practitioner, (iv) redirected to CALMS, (v) redirected to Imaging, (vi) redirected elsewhere and (vii) received some other outcome, for the years referred to in part (1).
(12) In relation to the TCH WiC, what was the breakdown of patients who used the service by (a) ACT resident/non resident, (b) ACT postcode, (c) age and (d) sex, for the years referred to in part (1).
(13) In relation to TCH WiC, (a) if residents from outside ACT were treated who paid for their treatment, (b) if only residents of the ACT are treated how are they identified, for example, by sighting a residential address on a driver’s license and (c) how many non ACT residents were turned away, for the years referred to in part (1).
(14) In relation to TCH WiC, what was the average spread of treatment by (a) day of week and (b) time of day, for the years referred to in part (1).
(15) Did the past three ACT Health Directorate annual reports list the top ten “Conditions treated” by the WiC; if so, for each of the years referred to in part (1), for the TCH WiC, what was the (a) full list of all the categories of “Conditions treated” and (b) total number of patients treated with each condition.
(16) What is the proposed use for the now closed TCH WiC site.
(17) What is the cost of refurbishing the site of the TCH WiC for other uses.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video