Page 1494 - Week 05 - Wednesday, 14 May 2014
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
remain committed, unlike the Canberra Liberals who I maintain are missing in action, or in non-action as the Chief Minister puts it, notwithstanding Mr Hanson and Mr Wall suddenly rushing at the last minute into the fray. I trust that Mr Hanson will support my motion and stick up for Canberra and that Mr Wall, after what he has just said, I certainly expect will be voting for my motion.
Question put:
That the amendment be agreed to.
The Assembly voted—
Ayes 8 |
Noes 9 | ||
Mr Coe |
Ms Lawder |
Mr Barr |
Ms Gallagher |
Mr Doszpot |
Mr Smyth |
Ms Berry |
Mr Gentleman |
Mrs Dunne |
Mr Wall |
Dr Bourke |
Ms Porter |
Mr Hanson |
Ms Burch |
Mr Rattenbury | |
Mrs Jones |
Mr Corbell |
Question so resolved in the negative.
Motion agreed to.
Planning—territory plan review
MR COE (Ginninderra) (4.25): I move:
That this Assembly:
(1) notes the ACT Government’s recent record in the planning portfolio, including:
(a) mismanagement of DV 306;
(b) counter-intuitive fees and charges that are contrary to the Government’s stated intentions;
(c) ill-conceived Planning and Development (Project Facilitation) Amendment Bill 2014;
(d) lack of consultation regarding the Planning, Building and Environment Legislation Amendment Bill 2014;
(e) growing complexity of the Territory Plan;
(f) lack of detail and awareness about the development of light rail; and
(g) lack of regard for stakeholders including builders, designers, planners and the community at large; and
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video