Page 3200 - Week 10 - Thursday, 15 August 2013
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
stand up for the government. He had his chance to say, “This estimates report should not go ahead,” but, of course, he rolled—and then rolled and rolled and kept on rolling. He rolled 597 times! He was rolling so fast he rolled backwards a couple of times to roll over again. He said, “I’ll roll over on the arts 20-odd times. Geez, that felt so good, I think I’ll roll again.” And so it continued.
The problem when you keep rolling over like this is that the disorientation cuts in, and suddenly you do not know where you are. So Mr Gentleman moved motions in the estimates committee that, because he was rolling around so much, he abstained from. “I think this is such a good idea that I’ll move a motion. Oh, hang on, no, what did Katy say? No, don’t vote for that. I abstain.”
We had the ridiculous scene in the estimates committee deliberation of a man who knew his own mind—twice! It is interesting that Mr Barr would raise recommendation 7 from the dissenting report.
Question put:
That the proposed expenditure be agreed to.
The Assembly voted—
Ayes 9 |
Noes 8 | ||
Mr Barr |
Ms Gallagher |
Mr Coe |
Ms Lawder |
Ms Berry |
Mr Gentleman |
Mr Doszpot |
Mr Smyth |
Dr Bourke |
Ms Porter |
Mrs Dunne |
Mr Wall |
Ms Burch |
Mr Rattenbury |
Mr Hanson | |
Mr Corbell |
Mrs Jones |
Question so resolved in the affirmative.
Proposed expenditure agreed to.
Clauses 1 to 11, by leave, taken together and agreed to.
Schedule 2 agreed to.
Title agreed to.
Bill agreed to.
Appropriation (Office of the Legislative Assembly) Bill 2013-2014
Debate resumed from 4 July 2013, on motion by Mr Barr:
That this bill be agreed to in principle.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video