Page 2014 - Week 05 - Thursday, 3 May 2012
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
|
Month |
Submissions |
|
Jan-11 |
724 |
|
Feb-11 |
789 |
|
Mar-11 |
982 |
|
Apr-11 |
588 |
|
May-11 |
545 |
|
Jun-11 |
483 |
|
Jul-11 |
467 |
|
Aug-11 |
545 |
|
Sep-11 |
500 |
|
Oct-11 |
484 |
|
Nov-11 |
631 |
|
Dec-11 |
489 |
|
Jan-12 |
662 |
|
Feb-12 |
656 |
|
Mar-12 |
872 |
(2) It is not possible to determine an average response time to online requests given the diverse and complex nature of the TAMS portfolio, however, when feedback is submitted online, a unique reference number is issued immediately which enables the matter to be followed up where required.
Roads—parking supply consultant
(Question No 2120)
Mr Coe asked the Minister for Territory and Municipal Services, upon notice, on 21 March 2012 (redirected to the Minister for the Environment and Sustainable Development):
In relation to the ACT Government Parking Supply Option Study prepared by Luxmoore Parking Consultants, (a) what was the total cost of this report, (b) what tender process was used to select this consultant and (c) were ACT based consultancy firms considered to undertake this study.
Mr Corbell: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:
(a) The total cost of the Parking Supply Option Study was $97 548 (including GST).
(b) The process used to select the consultant was a public tender.
(c) Five of the six consultants who submitted proposals have offices in the ACT. The evaluation of these submissions was carried out based on the criteria established in the tender process. Luxmoore Parking Consultants, a specialist division of Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) Group Limited, was able to establish strong claims against the tender criteria. The tender evaluation panel assessed ARRB’s submission as providing the best value for money.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video