Page 1689 - Week 05 - Tuesday, 1 May 2012
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
MR SPEAKER: I think that quite clearly the interjection is an imputation, and that cannot be done. Under the standing orders it must be done through a substantive motion. So I would ask you to withdraw, Mr Hanson.
Mr Hanson: I withdraw.
MR SPEAKER: Thank you. And Mr Seselja, you can too, please.
Mr Seselja: Sorry?
MR SPEAKER: You stood up after Mr Hargreaves raised the point of order and said—
Mr Seselja: The government cooked the books? Yes.
MR SPEAKER: Yes.
Mr Seselja: So are you saying now that the government did not cook the books?
MR SPEAKER: I am not saying anything.
Mr Seselja: You seem to be saying that, Mr Speaker.
MR SPEAKER: No, what I am saying—
Mr Seselja: Mr Speaker—
MR SPEAKER: Sit down, thank you. I am being quite clear that an imputation is not allowed under the standing orders.
Mr Seselja: About the government. Mr Speaker, under what standing order is an imputation against the government now not allowed? Could you just point us to that standing order?
Mr Hargreaves: A point of order, Mr Speaker.
MR SPEAKER: Yes.
Mr Hargreaves: It was not an isolated comment which would be taken at face value.
Mr Seselja interjecting—
Mr Hargreaves: I am speaking. How about you just be quiet?
MR SPEAKER: Order members! Let us have some civility.
Mr Hargreaves: How about you just be quiet for a moment?
Mr Seselja interjecting—
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video