Page 3583 - Week 08 - Thursday, 18 August 2011

(2) What was the subject of each completed RIS.

(3) How many matters should have, but did not have, an RIS prepared.

(4) What was the subject of each matter for which an RIS should have been prepared but was not.

Mr Barr: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

1) Nil

2) Not applicable

3) It is considered that the law and guidelines in relation to Regulation Impact Statements have been applied appropriately

4) Not applicable

Government—regulatory impact statements
(Question No 1656)

Mr Smyth asked the Minister for Tourism, Sport and Recreation, upon notice, on 30 June 2011:

(1) How many Regulatory Impact Statements (RIS) have been prepared in the Minister’s portfolio since October 2008.

(2) What was the subject of each completed RIS.

(3) How many matters should have, but did not have, an RIS prepared.

(4) What was the subject of each matter for which an RIS should have been prepared but was not.

Mr Barr: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

(1) Nil.

(2) Not applicable.

(3) Not applicable.

(4) Not applicable.

Mr Smyth asked the Attorney-General, upon notice, on 30 June 2011: