Page 3364 - Week 08 - Wednesday, 17 August 2011

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video


the government’s first priority is, of course, the development of office accommodation in Gungahlin, and we will be focusing on that priority. But we also recognise the need for longer-term solutions to accommodation issues and we will be working through those. But I have given, as I have indicated, the property sector the opportunity to deliver the project for the people of the ACT at a price better than what our consultants have advised is possible through government delivery.

MR HARGREAVES: A supplementary.

MR SPEAKER: Yes, Mr Hargreaves.

MR HARGREAVES: Thanks very much. My question to the minister is: given the Liberal Party’s dependence upon rental income from commercial properties, does their opposition to this project smack of conflict of interest?

Mrs Dunne: On a point of order, Mr Speaker, it is entirely irrelevant to the question about the government office block, and I draw again to your attention Mr Hargreaves’s propensity to ask questions which are clearly out of order to soak up the supplementaries.

MR SPEAKER: The question is out of order. The minister is not responsible for the rental situation of the Liberal Party headquarters. Mr Seselja, a supplementary question.

MR SESELJA: Thank you, Mr Speaker. Minister, if the government office block project as outlined is the best value for taxpayers, as you have already claimed, then why is there a need to test the market?

MR BARR: Again, I think the Leader of the Opposition is verballing me. What I would indicate is that—

Mr Seselja: It is a quote.

MR BARR: Yes.

Mr Smyth: You are being verballed by a quote!

MR BARR: No. In the context of the desire to co-locate—

Mr Doszpot interjecting—

MR SPEAKER: Order!

MR BARR: Thank you, Mr Speaker. In the context of the decision and the need to have new accommodation for the ACT public service, the decision to co-locate is a sensible one and is one that is broadly supported by all those who have the long-term interests of the ACT government at heart. In the context of having taken that decision, it was in that context that I made those remarks in May. In relation to the delivery of the project, as the Leader of the Opposition would be aware, there are a variety of


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video