Page 887 - Week 02 - Thursday, 10 March 2011
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
(b) Initial objectors are not informed when another DA is lodged for the same site unless they are notified by reason of the Planning and Development Act.
(c) A person who makes a representation on an application is notified in the same manner as outlined in the response to question 1 above.
Initial objectors who made a written submission on a second DA for the same site are informed of the outcome of the application
(3) No and nor do I as Minister.
A person who made a representation for the first application has the same method to establish knowledge of the project through the notification process for the subsequent DA for the site.
Planning—development applications
(Question No 1580)
Ms Le Couteur asked the Minister for Planning, upon notice, on 17 February 2011:
How many development applications have not been approved on environment grounds in the (a) impact, (b) merit and (c) code tracks.
Mr Barr: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:
The ACT Planning and Land Authority has reviewed the reasons of decisions for each of the 104 Development Applications (DAs) refused under the revised planning system that was introduced in March 2008. DAs refused on environment grounds are as follows:
a) Impact track - nil;
b) Merit track - 48; and
c) Code track - 1.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video