Page 3265 - Week 07 - Thursday, 1 July 2010
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
|
Rental Bonds | ||
|
• Executive |
0 |
0 |
|
• Professional |
0 |
0 |
|
• Support |
9.65 |
10 |
|
• Other |
0 |
0 |
|
Land Titles | ||
|
• Executive |
0 |
0 |
|
• Professional |
0 |
0 |
|
• Support |
11.24 |
12 |
|
• Other |
0 |
0 |
|
Workcover | ||
|
• Executive |
1 |
1 |
|
• Professional |
0 |
0 |
|
• Support |
5.64 |
6 |
|
• Other |
19 |
19 |
|
Business & Industry Licensing | ||
|
• Executive |
1 |
1 |
|
• Professional |
0 |
0 |
|
• Support |
14.67 |
15 |
|
• Other |
0 |
0 |
|
Total for these business units |
135.79 |
142 |
Public service—staffing
(Question No 733)
Mrs Dunne asked the Attorney-General, upon notice, on 23 March 2010:
(1) What was the head count and the full-time equivalent (FTE) count for staff employed in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal as at 31 December 2009.
(2) How many of the staff referred to in part (1), both head count and FTEs, were (a) judges, (b) registry staff, (c) legal professionals, (d) support staff and (e) other staff.
(3) What were the roles and classifications for those staff referred to in part (2)(e) as at 31 December 2009.
(4) What were the staffing costs, broken down into salaries and on-costs, for each category referred to in part (2) for the period 1 July to 31 December 2009.
(5) What is the projected head count and FTE count for (a) judges, (b) registry staff, (c) legal professionals, (d) support staff and (e) other staff as at 30 June 2010.
(6) What are the projected staffing costs, broken down into salaries and on-costs, for each category referred to in part (5) for the period 1 January to 30 June 2010.
Mr Corbell: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:
The answers to questions (1), (2), (4)-(6) are set out in the following table:
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video