Page 3246 - Week 07 - Thursday, 1 July 2010
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
increase in the energy concession rebate for low income earners and the protection of the community sector from the efficiency dividend.
We agree, albeit with some reservations, that it is a prudent and appropriate budget that delivers the government services the community expects and is entitled to. For all the reasons I have outlined and with the concerns noted, we support the Appropriation Bill 2010-2011.
Proposed expenditure agreed to.
Total appropriations—$2,367,825,000 (net cost of outputs), $1,031,798,000 (capital injection) and $475,943,000 (payments on behalf of the territory), totalling $3,904,566,000.
Question put:
That the proposed expenditure be agreed to.
The Assembly voted—
Ayes 10 |
Noes 5 | ||
Mr Barr |
Mr Hargreaves |
Mr Coe |
Mr Seselja |
Ms Bresnan |
Ms Hunter |
Mrs Dunne |
Mr Smyth |
Ms Burch |
Ms Le Couteur |
Mr Hanson | |
Mr Corbell |
Mr Rattenbury | ||
Ms Gallagher |
Mr Stanhope |
Question so resolved in the affirmative.
Clauses 1 to 11, by leave, taken together and agreed to.
Schedule 2 agreed to.
Title agreed to.
Question put:
That this bill be agreed to.
The Assembly voted—
Ayes 10 |
Noes 5 | ||
Mr Barr |
Mr Hargreaves |
Mr Coe |
Mr Seselja |
Ms Bresnan |
Ms Hunter |
Mrs Dunne |
Mr Smyth |
Ms Burch |
Ms Le Couteur |
Mr Hanson | |
Mr Corbell |
Mr Rattenbury | ||
Ms Gallagher |
Mr Stanhope |
Question so resolved in the affirmative.
Bill agreed to.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video