Page 2000 - Week 05 - Thursday, 6 May 2010

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video

(3) Print media, signs on development sites. (Chronicle and Canberra Times)

(4) Nil.

Government—advertising
(Question No 690)

Mr Seselja asked the Minister for the Environment, Climate Change and Water, upon notice, on 18 March 2010:

(1) How much has been spent on advertising to date in 2009-10 for the Minister’s department and each agency in their portfolio.

(2) On what campaigns was this money spent

(3) What form of media was employed to undertake this advertising.

(4) Which businesses were employed to undertake, or consult on, each campaign and how many of these are small businesses from the ACT.

Mr Corbell: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

(1) The Department has, to date, spent $170 000 on advertising in 2009-10.

(2)

Campaign	Business used
Greenpower	Couch Creative
Noise Awareness	Zoo Communication
ToiletSmart	2B
Monergy	Zoo Communication

(3) The Department utilised radio, print and cinema.

(4) The table above provides information on the businesses used for each campaign. The Department is not aware of whether these businesses fall within the definition of a ‘small business’. The businesses are ACT based and were selected on the basis of creativity/value for money.

Government—advertising
(Question No 691)

Mr Seselja asked the Minister for Land and Property Services, upon notice, on 18 March 2010: