Page 450 - Week 02 - Tuesday, 4 March 2008
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
learnt, had not been planned for, and we were not able to cope when it occurred. Consider the recent equine flu epidemic: it was quite evident that, while in a technical sense the ACT responded very effectively to the problem, the Stanhope government did not have a clue about how to respond to some very local issues. It had no idea how to plan to respond to the matter and it offered such limited assistance that many businesses were left either with no assistance or with very poor assistance when it finally arrived.
What about the aborted FireLink project? How many millions did that cost? Tharwa bridge: how many millions did that cost? The Civic to Belconnen busway: how many millions did that cost? It just goes on and on.
MR DEPUTY SPEAKER: The discussion is concluded.
Human Rights Amendment Bill 2007
Detail stage
Clause 7.
Debate resumed.
Question put:
That clause 7 be agreed to.
The Assembly voted—
|
Ayes 11 |
Noes 6 | ||
|
Mr Barr |
Mr Hargreaves |
Mrs Burke | |
|
Mr Berry |
Ms MacDonald |
Mrs Dunne | |
|
Mr Corbell |
Mr Mulcahy |
Mr Pratt | |
|
Dr Foskey |
Ms Porter |
Mr Seselja | |
|
Ms Gallagher |
Mr Stanhope |
Mr Smyth | |
|
Mr Gentleman |
Mr Stefaniak | ||
Question so resolved in the affirmative.
Clause 7 agreed to.
Clause 8.
MR SESELJA (Molonglo—Leader of the Opposition) (5.19): I will be opposing this clause. This is consequential to the proposal in clause 7.
Clause 8 agreed to.
Clause 9.
MR SESELJA (Molonglo—Leader of the Opposition) (5.19): I will be opposing this clause for the same reasons as my opposition to clause 8.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .