Page 3112 - Week 10 - Thursday, 18 October 2007
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
Question put.
That Mr Smyth’s motion be agreed to.
The Assembly voted—
Ayes 7 |
Noes 8 | ||
Mrs Dunne |
Mr Seselja |
Mr Barr |
Mr Hargreaves |
Dr Foskey |
Mr Smyth |
Mr Berry |
Ms MacDonald |
Mr Mulcahy |
Mr Stefaniak |
Mr Corbell |
Ms Porter |
Mr Pratt |
Mr Gentleman |
Mr Stanhope |
Question so resolved in the negative.
Planning and Environment—Standing Committee
Report 29
Debate resumed from 28 August 2007, on motion by Mr Gentleman:
That the report be noted.
MR SPEAKER: I call Dr Foskey.
DR FOSKEY (Molonglo) (11.34): Mr Speaker, I brought on the debate on this very important report today in order to highlight the link between poverty alleviation and public transport during Anti-Poverty Week.
MR SPEAKER: Order! Dr Foskey, you have already spoken on the matter. I call Mr Gentleman.
Mr Gentleman: Thank you, Mr Speaker—
Members interjecting—
MR SPEAKER: No, you will be closing the debate.
Dr Foskey: Mr Speaker, I seek leave to speak again.
Leave not granted.
MR SPEAKER: I call Mr Pratt.
MR PRATT (Brindabella) (11.35): Thank you, Mr Speaker. While the report into ACTION buses and the sustainable transport plan is a welcome start in addressing the many, many issues facing public transport, the report glides over many issues and there are many glaring omissions. I just want to stress the point that this report is titled ACTION buses and the sustainable transport plan. I just want to go back and look at the report itself and note that it was on 7 December 2004 that the ACT Legislative Assembly agreed to establish general purpose standing committees, and it was resolved, for example:
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .