Page 2075 - Week 07 - Thursday, 23 August 2007

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .

Examples of conditions that may be prescribed

1 requirement to keep documents or other administrative requirement

2 manage the impact of carrying out development, whether on or off development site

Clause 164 (3)

Page 126, line 24—

omit clause 164 (3), substitute

Note Public consultation period for a development application—see s 153A.

Clause 165 (1) (c)

Page 127, line 10—

omit clause 165 (1) (c), substitute

(c) if the application approved relates to the use of land, or a building or structure on the land—to the registrar-general for notification under the Land Titles Act 1925; and

Clause 170 (1) (b) and (c)

Page 130, line 24—

omit clause 170 (1) (b) and (c), substitute

(b) either—

(i) there are no representations about the application; or

(ii) there is no right to apply to the AAT for review of the decision to approve the application because—

(%3) the application is in the code track; or

(%3) the application was not required to be publicly notified under section 152; or

(%3) the proposal to which the application relates is exempt from review under a regulation; and

Clause 171 heading

Page 131, line 10—

omit clause 171 heading, substitute

171 When development approvals take effect—single representation with AAT review right

Proposed new clause 171 (1) (ba) to (bc)

Page 131, line 16—

insert

(ba) the development is not in the code track; and

(bb) the application was required to be publicly notified under section 152 (Major public notification); and

(bc) the development proposal is not exempt from review under a regulation; and

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .