Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2004 Week 05 Hansard (Friday, 14 May 2004) . . Page.. 2087 ..

Clauses 49 and 50 negatived.

Clause 51.

MR STEFANIAK (12.32): I will be opposing this clause, which is consequential. Mr Stanhope will be moving a consequential amendment.

MR STANHOPE (Chief Minister, Attorney-General, Minister for Environment and Minister for Community Affairs) (12.32 am): Mr Speaker, I move amendment No 8 circulated in my name on the blue sheet [see schedule 5 at page 2133].

Amendment agreed to.

Clause 51, as amended, agreed to.

Clauses 52 and 53, by leave, taken together.

MR STEFANIAK (12.32 am): I will be opposing these clauses. Again, they are consequential.

Clauses 52 and 53 negatived.

Clause 54 agreed to.

Clauses 55 to 57, by leave, taken together.

MR STEFANIAK (12.33 am): I will be opposing these clauses. Again, they are consequential.

Clauses 55 to 57 negatived.

Clause 58 agreed to.

Proposed new clause 58A.

MS DUNDAS (12.34 am): Mr Speaker, this amendment goes to the issue of donations. I have formed the opinion that Ms Tucker’s approach is more useful. I was not going to move this amendment, but I would like to put on the record that we are, I guess, making some—

MR SPEAKER: Well, it is a bit hard to put it on record if you are not going to move it.

MS DUNDAS: Fine. I move amendment No 3 circulated in my name [see schedule 2 at page 2120]. I realise it will be defeated.

Mr Speaker, I was not initially going to move the amendment because I believed that Ms Tucker had a better approach to dealing with these sections. However, that approach has not been successful either. So there will not be any changes in respect of disclosure of financial situations, and I think that is disappointing. I am sure it is something that will

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .