Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2004 Week 03 Hansard (Wednesday, 10 March 2004) . . Page.. 1027 ..


MS TUCKER: But I am speaking to my own amendment that I have just moved.

MR SPEAKER: You will still need leave.

MS TUCKER: Well, okay, I seek leave.

Leave granted.

MS TUCKER: I just want to respond very briefly to comments that Mr Stanhope made. I recognise the work that has been done by the recovery centre—that they have spoken to 1,000 people face to face. But as I said in the speech that I just made—a speech that I will not repeat, in the interests of shortening the debate, Mr Wood—some of the stakeholders clearly have some concern. All we are asking, fairly gently I would say, is that the government take that into account. It is certainly not an attack on the whole process.

Question put:

That Ms Tucker’s amendment to Mr Stanhope’s amendment be agreed to.

The Assembly voted—

Ayes 7

Noes 8

Mrs Burke

Mr Pratt

Mr Berry

Ms MacDonald

Mr Cornwell

Mr Smyth

Mr Corbell

Mr Quinlan

Ms Dundas

Ms Tucker

Mrs Cross

Mr Stanhope

Mrs Dunne

Mr Hargreaves

Mr Wood

Question so resolved in the negative.

Question put:

That Mr Stanhope’s amendment be agreed to.

The Assembly voted—

Ayes 10

Noes 5

Mr Berry

Ms MacDonald

Mrs Burke

Mr Corbell

Mr Quinlan

Mr Cornwell

Mrs Cross

Mr Stanhope

Mrs Dunne

Ms Dundas

Ms Tucker

Mr Pratt

Mr Hargreaves

Mr Wood

Mr Smyth

Question so resolved in the affirmative.

MR SPEAKER: The question is that Mr Smyth’s motion, as amended, be agreed to.


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .