Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2003 Week 9 Hansard (28 August) . . Page.. 3407 ..


(3) What are the reasons for the increase of $0.297 million in revenue and the reduction of $0.144 million in expenses for the Agents' Board;

(4) What are the reasons for the variance of $0.305 million in the outcome for the Australian International Hotel School;

(5) What are the reasons for the increase of $0.297 million in revenue and the reduction of $0.062 million in expenses for the Canberra Cemeteries Trust;

(6) What are the reasons for the increase of $6.397 million in expenses for the Canberra Institute of Technology;

(7) What are the reasons for the $3.785 million variance in the outcome for the Central Financing Unit;

(8) What are the reasons for the reduction of $42.027 million in revenue and the reduction of $19.133 million in expenses for the Gungahlin Development Authority;

(9) What are the reasons for the $1.463 million variance in the outcome for the Home Loan Portfolio;

(10) What are the reasons for the $0.077 million variance in the outcome for the Independent Competition and Regulatory Commission;

(11) What are the reasons for the increase of $5.337 million in revenue and the increase of $7.227 million in expenses for the Land Development Authority

(12) What are the reasons for the variance $0.646 million in the outcome for the Legal Aid Commission;

(13) What are the reasons for the reduction of $0.233 million in expenses for the Legislative Assembly Secretariat (Departmental);

(14) What are the reasons for the variance of $1.270 million in the outcome for Totalcare;

(15) What are the reasons for the increase of $0.536 million in expenses for the Workers Compensation Fund;

(16) What are the reasons for the reduction of $1.999 million in revenue and the reduction of $14.889 million in expenses for the ACT Superannuation Unit;

(17) What are the reasons for the $63.376 million variance in the outcome for the Central Financing Unit;

(18) What are the reasons for the variance of $0.350 million in the outcome for the Legislative Assembly Secretariat (Territorial);

(19) What are the reasons for the variance of $3.320 million in the outcome for ACT Housing;

(20) What is the reason for the variance of $4.006 million in the outcome for ACT Electricity and Water;


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .