Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .
Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2002 Week 14 Hansard (10 December) . . Page.. 4187 ..
5
Clause 24 (1)
Page 11, line 21-
omit
an offence of absolute liability
substitute
an absolute liability offence
6
Clause 33 (2)
Page 17, line 8 -
omit clause 33 (2), substitute
(2) However, if-
(a) each physical element of an offence has a fault element of basic intent; and
(b) any part of a defence is based on actual knowledge or belief;
evidence of self-induced intoxication cannot be considered in deciding whether the knowledge or belief exists.
7
Clause 42 (3) (a)
Page 21, line 23-
omit
really serious injury
substitute
serious harm
8
Clause 58 (3), proposed new examples
Page 34, line 5-
insert
Examples
1 The XYZ Act 2002, section 10 (1) creates an offence of producing a false or misleading document. Section 10 (2) provides-
(2) This section does not apply if the document is not false or misleading in a material particular.
Section 10 (2) is an exception to section 10 (1). A defendant who wishes to rely on the exception has an evidential burden that the document is not false or misleading in a material particular.
2 The XYZ Act 2002, section 10 (1) creates an offence of a person making a statement knowing that it omits something without which the statement is misleading. Section 10 (2) provides-
(2) This section does not apply if the omission does not make the statement misleading in a material particular.
Section 10 (2) is an exception to section 10 (1). A defendant who wishes to rely on the exception has an evidential burden that the omission did not make the statement misleading in a material particular.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .