Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2002 Week 13 Hansard (21 November) . . Page.. 3987 ..


QUESTION ON NOTICE NO. 270 Attachment G

INQUIRIES, REPORTS, REVIEWS, COMMITTEES OF INQUIRY AND

TASKFORCES

(Established during 2000-2001)

Agency name: Chief Minister's Department

Name of inquiry / report / review / committee / taskforce:

Review of Therapy Services for School Students with a Disability

Established: June 2001

Cost: $33,000

Terms of Reference / Guidelines:

The primary objectives of the review were to:

� Identify and recommend best practice models for improving the availability of therapy services to school-age children with disabilities

� Identify and recommend best practice models for the mode of delivery of therapy services to students with disabilities

� Identify and recommend best practice models of strategy development to ensure equitable access to significantly improve the availability and intensity of therapy services to school-age children with a disability

� Identify and recommend best practice models for the integrated delivery of therapy services

� Identify and recommend best practice administrative arrangements for the delivery of therapy services to school age students with disabilities

� Identify and recommend best practice models for a whole of government planning process for children and young people with disabilities.

QUESTION ON NOTICE NO. 270 Attachment H

INQUIRIES, REPORTS, REVIEWS, COMMITTEES OF INQUIRY AND

TASKFORCES

(Established during 2000-2001)

Agency name: Chief Minister's Department

Name of inquiry / report / review / committee / taskforce:

Review of the ACT Public Sector Workers' Compensation Premium Devolution Model

Established: 15 May 2001 (date of contract)

Cost: $78,412 (total cost inclusive of GST)

Terms of Reference / Guidelines:

The reviewer was asked to examine the methodology for devolving the ACT Government's workers' compensation premium to agencies and instrumentalities and make recommendations for changes which could be implemented in the devolution of the 2001-2002 premium. See attached extract for full statement of requirements.


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .