Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2002 Week 4 Hansard (11 April) . . Page.. 1172 ..


(10) Given that Environment ACT and the Fairbairn Park Control Council were in the middle of discussions to agree upon a long term noise regime and given that in your own draft policy Environment ACT has lumped in the National Capital Car Club with Fairbairn Park, why was that credit not taken from the National Capital Car Club instead of Fairbairn Park.

(11) Can you supply details of all the lease arrangements in relation to the Fairbairn Park cluster since the start of that complex in the 1970s, specifically the area covered by its lease/leases and the term of each lease.

(12) Is the Minister able to give details of any other State or Territory within the Commonwealth of Australia where noise measurements have been stipulated by legislation or by subordinate legislation to be measured from a site located in another State or Territory.

(13) Is the Minister able to supply details of noise restrictions and noise control regimes for motor sport events in the six Australian states and the Northern Territory, giving details and copies of any relevant state legislation and any relevant local government laws, regulations, etc.

(14) For the years mentioned in (1) above, detail the number of tracks operating at Fairbairn Park (ie, the area currently comprising the four tracks mentioned prior to (1) above that are to my understanding under the auspices of the Fairbairn Park Control Council) and list for each area the relevant noise restrictions applicable to those tracks, including hours of operation and any restrictions in relation to times or days events could not occur.

(15) List for the years mentioned in (1) above, the number of tracks operating at Fairbairn Park and name those tracks.

(16) Supply a map detailing exactly where motor sport tracks are in the area of the Fairbairn Park cluster.

(17) The draft noise policy asks for submissions which closed at the end of February 2001: (a) how many submissions were received; (b) how many persons signed the petition supporting motor sport and calling for not less than 30 noise credits for Fairbairn Park and not less than 10 noise credits for the track controlled by the National Capital Car Club and of the other submissions, (c) how many were in support of motor sport activities at Fairbairn Park; and (d) how many called for further restrictions on motor sport at Fairbairn Park.

(18) Apart from the submission from the co-convenors of the Ridgeway Residents Action Group, were there any other submissions calling for further noise restrictions or other restrictions to motor racing at Fairbairn Park. If so, (a) how many, (b) who were they from and (c) provide details of the suburb and town of the persons making the submission.

(19) Provide copies of submissions (a) in favour of increasing credits for motor sport, (b) further restrictions in noise credits for motor sport, and (c) maintenance of the status quo.


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .