Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .
Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2001 Week 10 Hansard (28 August) . . Page.. 3465 ..
MR MOORE (continuing):
introduced some amendments to deal with issues she raised at our round table discussion. This is something that I think does require continual monitoring. I have circulated the sorts of evaluations that we applied to this system. I can assure members that people within the department and others will now be working to ensure that this is delivered in the most effective possible way, with the least impact on families and taking into account the concerns of the families. I thank members for their support.
Question resolved in the affirmative.
Bill agreed to in principle.
Detail stage
Clause 1.Motion (by Ms Tucker ) put:
That the debate be adjourned.
The Assembly voted-
Ayes 7 Noes 8 Mr Berry Mr Quinlan Mrs Burke Mr Osborne Mr Corbell Mr Stanhope Mr Cornwell Mr Rugendyke Mr Hargreaves Ms Tucker Mr Hird Mr Smyth Mr Kaine Mr Moore Mr StefaniakQuestion so resolved in the negative.
Clause 1 agreed to.
Clause 2 agreed to.
Clause 3 agreed to.
Clause 4 agreed to.
Clause 5.
MR OSBORNE (11.36): I move amendment No 1 circulated in my name [see schedule 8 at page 3565].
As I said in my speech earlier, Mr Temporary Deputy Speaker, this will allow home detention to be used in conjunction with an imprisonment sentence. A mix will be available. It can be part imprisonment and part home detention.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .