Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2001 Week 6 Hansard (15 June) . . Page.. 1878 ..


Question so resolved in the negative.

Amendment negatived.

MR STEFANIAK (Minister for Education and Attorney-General) (3.58): Mr Speaker, I move amendment No 1 circulated in my name [see schedule 1, part 1, at page 1971]. This amendment seeks to omit paragraph (b) of clause 5 (1) and substitute a new paragraph.

Mr Speaker, paragraph (b) reads:

the person complies with all requirements made by a security officer under this Act; and

My amendment proposes that that paragraph be omitted and the following paragraph be substituted:

the person complies with all the requirements made under this Act by a security officer; and

The amendment simply makes it clearer that a person must comply with the requirements, imposed under the proposed act, by the security officer. This in fact reflects a suggestion that the scrutiny of bills committee made.

Mr Speaker, I present a supplementary explanatory memorandum to government amendments to the bill.

MR STANHOPE (Leader of the Opposition) (3.59): The Labor Party supports the amendment.

Amendment agreed to.

MR STEFANIAK (Minister for Education and Attorney-General) (4.00): Mr Speaker, I move amendment No 2 circulated in my name [see schedule 1, part 1, at page 1971]. This amendment, which was suggested by Parliamentary Counsel, removes a reference to an act that is to be repealed.

MR STANHOPE (Leader of the Opposition) (4.01): The Labor Party supports the amendment.

Amendment agreed to.

Clause 5, as amended, agreed to.

Clause 6 agreed to.

Proposed new clauses 6A to 6D.


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .