Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .
Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2001 Week 5 Hansard (2 May) . . Page.. 1381 ..
MR QUINLAN (continuing):
Question put:
That this bill be agreed to in principle.
The Assembly voted-
Ayes 7 Noes 6 Mr Berry Ms Tucker Mrs Burke Mr Stefaniak Mr Corbell Mr Wood Mr Cornwell Mr Hargreaves Mr Humphries Mr Quinlan Mr Moore Mr Rugendyke Mr SmythQuestion so resolved in the affirmative.
Bill agreed to in principle.
Leave granted to dispense with the detail stage.
Question put:
That this bill be agreed to.
The Assembly voted-
Ayes 7 Noes 6 Mr Berry Ms Tucker Mrs Burke Mr Stefaniak Mr Corbell Mr Wood Mr Cornwell Mr Hargreaves Mr Humphries Mr Quinlan Mr Moore Mr Rugendyke Mr SmythQuestion so resolved in the affirmative.
MR SPEAKER: I must draw members' attention to paragraph 5 (1) (a) of the Proportional Representation (Hare-Clark) Entrenchment Act 1995, which states that this act or any amendment or repeal of this act has no effect unless it is passed by at least a two-thirds majority of members of the Legislative Assembly. The vote, you will recall, was seven for the ayes and six for the noes.
Remuneration Tribunal (Amendment) Bill 1999
Debate resumed from 5 May 1999, on motion by Ms Tucker:
That this bill be agreed to in principle.
MR HUMPHRIES
(Chief Minister, Minister for Community Affairs and Treasurer) (4.55): Mr Speaker, this bill has two aspects. First of all, it restricts membership of the Remuneration Tribunal and, secondly, it provides for disallowance by the Assembly of Remuneration Tribunal determinations. The government, not surprisingly, opposes both
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .