Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2001 Week 3 Hansard (6 March) . . Page.. 669 ..

MR STANHOPE (continuing):

will, and we will see whether or not the prognostications of doom that some of us perceive come to pass.

MS TUCKER (9.49): Yes, we will be supporting this, although obviously the support is not needed. I would just comment that I think it is another weakening of the position that we would like to take and that Mr Rugendyke took. It is obviously something he has put because it is necessary to get support for it, but I think it is actually quite disappointing.

Amendment agreed to.

Clause 149 agreed to.

Clauses 150 to 161, by leave, taken together and agreed to.

Schedule 1.

MR STEFANIAK (Minister for Education and Attorney-General) (9.50): That has been withdrawn.

Ms Tucker: I will oppose schedule 1.

MR STEFANIAK: I was to move amendment No 26. I think that is now withdrawn, Mr Speaker. My amendment does not need to proceed.

MR SPEAKER: You are not going to move your amendment No 26, Mr Stefaniak?

MR STEFANIAK: No.

Mr Stanhope: This has something to do with Manuka Plaza, hasn't it, Bill? Car parking premises.

MR STEFANIAK: I think that was section 400 or something.

Schedule 1 negatived.

Schedule 2.

MR STEFANIAK (Minister for Education and Attorney-General) (9.52): Mr Speaker, I move amendment No 27 circulated in my name on the purple sheet [see schedule 1 part 1 at page 679].

This clarifies paragraphs 2 (i) and (j) in schedule 2. In paragraph (i) it restricts the value of rental value, and in (j) it extends it to a proposed lease.

MR STANHOPE (Leader of the Opposition) (9.52): The Labor Party supports this amendment, Mr Speaker.

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .