Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2001 Week 2 Hansard (1 March) . . Page.. 468 ..

The Assembly voted-

	Ayes 8				Noes 9

Mr Berry	Mr Stanhope	Mrs Burke	Mr Moore
Mr Corbell	Ms Tucker	Mr Cornwell	Mr Osborne
Mr Hargreaves	Mr Wood		Mr Hird		Mr Smyth
Mr Quinlan			Mr Humphries	Mr Stefaniak
Mr Rugendyke			Mr Kaine

Amendment negatived.

MR SPEAKER: Mr Stanhope, do you have another amendment?

Mr Stanhope: I will not move that amendment. I will not proceed with that. The issue is the same as the one just voted on-well, sort of.

MR SPEAKER: I understand, thank you.

MR STEFANIAK (Minister for Education and Attorney-General) (12.25): Mr Speaker, I move amendment No 5 circulated in my name [see schedule 1 at page 523].

Mr Speaker, this amendment is consequential on the insertion of the proposed Part 5.2A of my amendment No 14.

Amendment agreed to.

Clauses 31 to 35, as amended, agreed to.

Clause 36.

MR STEFANIAK (Minister for Education and Attorney-General) (12.26): Mr Speaker, I seek leave to move amendments Nos 6 and 7 circulated in my name together.

Leave granted.

MR STEFANIAK: Mr Speaker, I move amendments Nos 6 and 7 circulated in my name [see schedule 1 at page 523].

Amendment No 6 is consequential on amendment No 7. Amendment No 7 is a technical amendment that brings the language of clause 36 (1) more closely into line with the language currently used in the provisions that confer power to make statutory instruments, for example regulations.

For example, the standard regulation-making power is as follows:

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .