Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .
Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2000 Week 4 Hansard (30 March) . . Page.. 1150 ..
MR HARGREAVES (continuing):
This motion seeks to remove as offences the provisions that Mr Rugendyke, Mr Osborne and I were speaking about. Members may recall that I have three concerns about that. One is the substantive issue of the provisions of rule 213 which we have changed due to Mr Rugendyke's amendment. This motion seeks to remove specific offences. I am seeking the agreement of the Assembly to making the situation as Mr Rugendyke has set out but that we take out the offences, such that the penalty of $60 would not apply.
Question put:
That the motion (Mr Hargreaves' ) be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 7 NOES, 8 Mr Berry Ms Carnell Mr Hargreaves Mr Cornwell Mr Quinlan Mr Hird Mr Rugendyke Mr Humphries Mr Stanhope Mr Kaine Ms Tucker Mr Moore Mr Wood Mr Osborne Mr SmythQuestion so resolved in the negative.
Motion (by Ms Tucker ) put:
That Subordinate Law 2000 No 10 made under the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 relating to the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Regulations 2000 be amended, pursuant to section 6 of the Subordinate Laws Act 1989, as follows:
1 â
Proposed new regulation 8A
Page 5, line 29-
After regulation 8, insert the following new regulation:8Aâ ARR rr 62-63, r 65, r 67, r 69, rr 72-73, rr 80-83-modification of certain give-way rules for bicycle riders
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .