Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .
Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2000 Week 3 Hansard (9 March) . . Page.. 864 ..
MR SPEAKER: I would suggest you all sit down. If you do not, I am going to adjourn the Assembly until the ringing of the bells. I suggest you are in for a long night otherwise.
MR WOOD: If Mr Osborne was suggesting that this was not a sale, he is even more incorrect in the assertions he made about Ms Follett. Let us put this on the record: The sale of public utilities was not a condition of signing on to that deal - absolutely, clearly, definitely, without any misunderstanding.
MR OSBORNE: Mr Speaker, under standing order 47, I seek to make a personal explanation. I have been misrepresented here. I can understand the embarrassment, especially of Mr Berry and Mr Wood, being members of the then Cabinet. All I said was that this debate has its origin back at the time when those two leaders signed the agreement.
Mr Wood: No, it does not.
Mr Stanhope: That is rubbish.
MR SPEAKER: Order! The house will come to order. If this keeps up people will be thrown out. There is no question about that. Do I make myself perfectly clear? I remind you again that I am not sure that anybody would wish not to be here for this significant vote.
Amendment (Mr Quinlan 's ), as amended, agreed to.
Question put:
That motion, as amended, be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 9 NOES, 8 Ms Carnell Mr Berry Mr Cornwell Mr Corbell Mr Hird Mr Hargreaves Mr Humphries Mr Osborne Mr Kaine Mr Quinlan Mr Moore Mr Stanhope Mr Rugendyke Ms Tucker Mr Smyth Mr Wood Mr StefaniakQuestion so resolved in the affirmative.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .