Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .
Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2000 Week 3 Hansard (9 March) . . Page.. 856 ..
MR SPEAKER: I have a small problem here. The question is that Mr Quinlan's amendments, as amended, be agreed to.
Mr Humphries: Can we take the two parts seriatim, Mr Speaker?
MR SPEAKER: I think we will have to, Mr Humphries. Correct me if I am wrong, Mr Kaine, but it is my understanding that you amended the second of Mr Quinlan's amendments. Is that correct?
Mr Kaine: My amendment merely replaced part of Mr Quinlan's second amendment.
MR SPEAKER: Yes, thank you. Very well. Is it the wish of the Assembly to take them seriatim?
Mr Humphries: I will move that the motion be put in two parts, Mr Speaker.
Mr Berry: Why don't you want to do it as one?
Mr Humphries: Because we want to support one half and oppose the other. That is why.
Ordered that the question be divided.
Question put:
That amendment (1) (Mr Quinlan 's ) be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 8 NOES, 9Question so resolved in the negative.Mr Berry Ms Carnell Mr Corbell Mr Cornwell Mr Hargreaves Mr Hird Mr Osborne Mr Humphries Mr Quinlan Mr Kaine Mr Stanhope Mr Moore Ms Tucker Mr Rugendyke Mr Wood Mr Smyth Mr Stefaniak
MR SPEAKER: The question now is that Mr Quinlan's amendment (2), as amended by Mr Kaine's amendment, be agreed to.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .