Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .
Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2000 Week 2 Hansard (29 February) . . Page.. 348 ..
Question put:
That the amendment (Ms Tucker's ), as amended be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 7 NOES, 8 Mr Berry Ms Carnell Mr Corbell Mr Cornwell Mr Hargreaves Mr Humphries Mr Kaine Mr Moore Mr Quinlan Mr Osborne Mr Stanhope Mr Rugendyke Ms Tucker Mr Smyth Mr StefaniakQuestion so resolved in the negative.
Bill, as a whole, as amended, agreed to.
Bill, as amended, agreed to.
MR STANHOPE: Mr Speaker, my question is to the Chief Minister. In answer to a question about the value of the Bruce Stadium hirer's agreement to the Canberra Raiders, the Chief Minister on 24 September 1997 told Mr Whitecross, among other things:
There is no guaranteed income payable by the Stadium to the Raiders regardless of how many patrons they attract to their home games ... There is no guaranteed income payable. The Raiders, as a hirer, will receive the greater percentage of revenue from ticket sales, but this is not predicated on any minimum or maximum crowd figure.
The Chief Minister went on to say:
... obviously, if no advertising or corporate suites are sold, there will be no revenue to share. Everyone will get nothing. A share of zero, the last time I checked, is zero.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .