Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .
Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2000 Week 1 Hansard (16 February) . . Page.. 196 ..
MS TUCKER (continuing):
discussion that we are having. Even if this Government is not that interested in the broader ecological issues for our country, it should be interested in the economic implications for the ACT.
Question put:
That the amendment (Mr Corbell's ) be agreed to.
A call of the Assembly having commenced -
Mr Humphries: Mr Speaker, we wish to withdraw our opposition to the amendment, so there is no requirement for a division.
MR SPEAKER: Is leave granted to withdraw? There being no objection, leave is granted.
Amendment agreed to.
Question put:
That the motion, as amended, be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 7 NOES, 8 Mr Corbell Mr Cornwell Mr Hargreaves Mr Hird Mr Osborne Mr Humphries Mr Quinlan Mr Kaine Mr Stanhope Mr Moore Ms Tucker Mr Rugendyke Mr Wood Mr Smyth Mr StefaniakQuestion so resolved in the negative.
That this Bill be agreed to in principle.
MR SMYTH
(Minister for Urban Services) (4.06): Mr Speaker, this Bill seeks to put into the legislation that starts on 1 March the amendments that Mr Rugendyke made to the old legislation last year. The new road rules will not come into place until 1 March because of the delay in their consideration by the Assembly, so we have to reinsert these provisions in the new Bill. The situation is as before. The Government has a small
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .