Hansard - ACT Legislative Assembly

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 1999 Week 6 Hansard (22 June) . . Page.. 1722 ..

9. Was (a) Mr Walker or (b) Mr Webster required to give any undertaking that

he would disassociate himself entirely from future commercial dealings with

the Territory Government that, in any way, might have been touched upon in

any of the sessions?

10. Will the Government automatically exclude either (a) Mr Walker or

(b) Mr Webster from any future commercial dealings or negotiations that have

any connection with matters discussed at any session?

11. What are the details of the fees and expenses that were incurred in engaging

(a) Mr Walker and (b) Mr Webster for the facilitation role?

12. By what selection process was (a) Mr Walker and (b) Mr Webster engaged?

13. Were any other individuals or organisations considered for this facilitation

task?

Ms Carnell:

The answer to the member's question is as follows:

1. There were three sessions.

2. One was a session jointly facilitated by Mr Walker and Mr Webster. The other

two sessions had no particular facilitator.

3. One session.

4. Two sessions.

5. No sessions.

6. Re ACTEW: No.

Re possible ACTEW merger: No.

Re future of Kingston Foreshore: Raised in passing.

Re Bruce Stadium: No.

7. No.

8. Not applicable due to response to question 7.

9. Not applicable due to response to question 7.

No. Matters discussed where Mr Webster and/or Mr Walker did not attend will not disqualify them.

$4,000 in preparation, development and facilitation fees plus $465 in travel/accommodation paid to Mr Webster and travel costs of $310 were paid to Mr Walker.